Submitted by Thomas on
Forums:
Dear All
For astrophotography I recently did some cooling tests with my Sony Nex-3N and my Fuji X-A1 (30s exposure, closed camera, ISO1600). From Rawdigger histograms, the Fuji seems clearly superior concerning noise behavior, however, the Sony histograms have only each 2nd/4th bin filled at identical RD settings. I attach the two histograms for comparison, does anybody have an idea what difference in raw format might lead to this effect?
Best regards
Thomas
Dear Sir:
Submitted by LibRaw on
Dear Sir:
Sony NEX-3N uses lossy compression, please see https://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/sony-craw-arw2-posterization-detection
Sony ARW2.3 format is
Submitted by lexa on
Sony ARW2.3 format is explained in depth in our article: https://www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/sony-craw-arw2-posterization-detection (scroll to the second big section: Inside SONY cRAW format)
Add new comment